Archive for July, 2009

Impact of uranium mining on Australia’s precious water supplies

July 27, 2009

What impact is uranium mining having on our water?

The Advertiser, by Jim Green, 25 july 09

ENVIRONMENT Minister Peter Garrett buttressed his decision last week to approve in situ leach (ISL) uranium mining at Beverley Four Mile with the claim that he is “certain this operation poses no credible risk to the environment”.

Thus Mr Garrett adds another chapter to the history of spin surrounding ISL mining.

Environmental debates typically revolve around differing assessments of the possibility of environmental contamination.

But with ISL mining, environmental pollution – specifically contamination of groundwater with radionuclides, heavy metals and acid – is a certainty.

ISL mining involves pumping an acidic solution into an aquifer, dissolving the uranium ore and other heavy metals and pumping the solution back to the surface.

After the uranium has been separated, liquid radioactive waste is simply dumped in the aquifer. Isolation and containment of the pollutants would not be difficult or expensive, but the mining companies will take the cheaper option of polluting groundwater for as long as the politicians let them……………………

A 2003 Senate References and Legislation Committee report recommended banning the discharge of radioactive liquid mine waste to groundwater. ISL uranium mining is used at the Beverley uranium mine and it is the mining method proposed for Beverley Four Mile, Oban and Honeymoon.

The future of this mining technique is plain to see: short-lived mines leaving SA with a legacy of polluted aquifers.

Spills and leaks are common at ISL mines. The SA Department of Primary Industry and Resources lists 59 spills at Beverley from 1998 to 2007.

Serious questions must be raised as to BHP Billiton’s capacity to safely manage radioactive tailings at Olympic Dam if, as planned, tailings production increases sevenfold to 68 million tonnes annually and water consumption increases to more than 250 million litres daily.

BHP Billiton pays nothing for its massive water take for the Olympic Dam mine, despite recording a $17.7 billion profit in 2007-8. That arrangement is enshrined in the Roxby Downs Indenture Act 1982………

……… The Indenture Act provides a raft of exemptions and overrides from the SA Natural Resources Act 2004, the Environment Protection Act 1993, the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 and even the Freedom of Information Act 1991.

BHP Billiton and the Rann Government are currently engaged in secret discussions over the future of the Indenture Act.

Nuclear decommissioning: the problem that won’t go away

July 22, 2009

Petroleum Economist 22 July 09“…………………………IT IS A sprawling landscape of chimneys, storage ponds filled with nuclear waste and radioactive buildings awaiting demolition. The UK’s Thorpe nuclear-processing plant at Sellafield – nestled somewhat incongruously among the picturesque hills of Cumbria, northern England – is unlikely ever to become a tourist attraction, despite its fame.

For decades, Sellafield has been officially the most hazardous building in western Europe (according to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority). And disposing safely of its crumbling, highly radioactive edifices, its hastily dumped reactor parts and decaying fuel rods is a slow and painstaking job that will probably ensure Sellafield holds the same dubious accolade for decades more…………..http://www.petroleum-economist.com/default.asp?Page=14&PUB=46&SID=721393&ISS=25450

NST Online Away from the media glare, Asean talks nuclear

July 20, 2009

Away from the media glare, Asean talks nuclear 2009/07/19

Sheridan Mahavera reporting from Phuket

ASEAN is again likely to be known as a group that is better at promoting development among its 10 member countries than promoting noble political principles like the rule of law or protecting human rights.

The idea of having its own human rights body has grabbed headlines in the region but some of the more noteworthy meetings that are going on away from the glare of the media are about how some member countries are going nuclear…………………………………It was previously reported that Thailand is planning to build a nuclear plant that could cost US$6 billion (RM21.4 billion) and produce 4,000-megawatts of electricity in 2020.

While Vietnam had announced that it would start building two nuclear power plants, each with two 1,000-megawatt reactors, in 2013 in its southern province of Ninh Thuan.

Malaysia has yet to make public its nuclear power plans but Tenaga Nasional Berhad has said it wants to build a power plant by 2025.

Meanwhile, Asean secretary-general Surin Pitsuwan confirmed that officials would be putting the final touches to the China and Australia agreements over the next few days. Once signed, the pacts would create free trade zones between Asean and the two countries.

NST Online Away from the media glare, Asean talks nuclear

Uranium miners fight for trust

July 20, 2009

Uranium miners fight for trust Australian Mining 20 July 2009

| by Paul HayesPrint this article Comments Share this articleWestern Australia (WA) uranium miners need to work to gain the trust of local residents as they transport yellowcake through suburban areas, Energy and Minerals Australia (EMA) managing director Chris Davis told MINING DAILY.According to Davis, it will take time for WA residents to be at ease with yellowcake transport, unlike residents of other states or territories with established uranium industries.

Uranium miners fight for trust


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.