Archive for the ‘economics’ Category

Further uncertainty about the future of Toro Energy’s Western Australia uranium project

May 23, 2013

Claims Toro’s uranium project may struggle May 20, 2013 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-20/claims-toro27s-uranium-project-not-financially-viable/4700982 An economist is warning that the first proposed uranium mine in Western Australia may struggle to get off the ground.

The comments are made in a report, commissioned by Greens Senator Scott Ludlam and environmental groups, into the viability of Toro Energy’s proposed Wiluna project.

The study by ‘Economics at Large’ indicates the project’s profitability relies on a number of sensitive factors. The paper’s author, Roderick Campbell, says Toro may struggle to make the project viable.

“The Wiluna project sits very high on the cost curve of global uranium projects,” he said. ”It’s difficult to see why any of the major uranium players would invest in this project when there’s a lot of cheaper projects out there.”

Toro has released a statement saying the Wiluna project has won WA and Federal Government environmental approval to proceed after a rigorous three and a half year assessment process. It says, as a result, there is significant market interest from international energy utilities and global resource investors in the Wiluna project.

Senator Ludlam claims the project will just manage to be financially viable if Toro can avoid clean-up and decommissioning costs.He says Toro has not submitted a costed mine closure plan and the numbers are against the company when the cost of the clean-up is factored in.

Toro is yet to respond to that particular claim.

New report dispels Toro’s glowing propaganda about Wiluna uranium project

May 23, 2013

20 May 13,  West Australia’s first planned uranium mine has been put under the spotlight and found lacking in a detailed new economic analysis.

The viability of Toro Energy’s Wiluna uranium proposal has been examined by the independent economic consultancy Economists at Large in a report jointly commissioned by the Anti-Nuclear Alliance of WA and the office of WA Senator Scott Ludlam.

“It is time for Toro to come clean on the full costs of the Wiluna project”, said ANAWA member Mia Pepper. “Toro’s mine closure plans and costs require particular attention as the project’s viability rests on these.”

“In 2013 ERA – the operator of the Ranger uranium mine in Kakadu – estimated closure costs at $640 million. Even if you half that and half that again for this small low grade project, mine closure estimates are still around $150 million – we are yet to hear full details from Toro about this cost.”

The report outlines that for Toro to achieve a positive Net Present Value would require the convergence of a range of external scenarios including low mine closure costs, structural changes in the long term uranium contract price, a drop in Australian exchange rates, cost easing in the mining sector and better efficiency in mining, milling and recovery rates so the project proceeds on time, within budget and without technical snags. The chance of all these factors occurring is very low.

“The Toro project represents risk at every stage”, said Mia Pepper. “It is a risk to the environment at Lake Way, a risk to shareholders and investors and a risk to WA tax payers. This report confirms that the economics of the project are volatile and uncertain – however it is certain that the project will remain strongly contested”.

“From people taking action on country – like the seventy committed people walking through the region in opposition to uranium mining right now – to sounding the alarm in the board room, this flawed mine plan will be contested. The Toro Energy plan has never made sense and this report shows that it also won’t make dollars”.

The author of the report, Roderick Campbell, economist with Economist at Large, is available for comment on 0438503249.

Paladin writes down value of Kayelekera Uranium Mine in Malawi

May 23, 2013

Kayelekera value cut over weak spot prices THE DAILY TIMES , 17 MAY 2013  THOM KHANJE Australian-uranium miner, Paladin Energy, has slashed a further US$45 million from the value of its Kayelekera Mine in Karonga as poor spot prices of uranium continue to negatively affect its earnings from the mine.

Following the write-down, the mine is now valued at only USid=”mce_marker”40.8 million, down from over US$200 million nine months ago.

In its financial report for nine months to March 31 released this week, Paladin blamed continued poor uranium prices for the losses.

The spot uranium price, which has been in the doldrums since the 2011 Fukishima nuclear disaster, went down to a three-year low of US$40.75 a pound by the beginning of this week.

Paladin has since reported an overall net loss of US$247.7 million for the nine months, a sharp drop from the USid=”mce_marker”37.7 million net loss for the similar previous period…….

The falling uranium price and reduced production levels at both the Kayelekera and Langer Heinrich Mine in Namibia during the first quarter of 2013 compared to the previous three months, have also led to a fall in Paladin’s stock market value….. http://www.bnltimes.com/index.php/daily-times/headlines/business/15096-kayelekera-value-cut-over-weak-spot-prices

ERA, Paladin, Bannerman Resources all have over 90% decline in share price

May 23, 2013

Coal, uranium and gold stocks among the hardest hit as good times end BY:ROBIN BROMBY  The Australian   May 20, 2013  “…… Among those hardest hit are coal, uranium and gold. The base metal stocks don’t seem to have suffered to quite the same degree, although few stocks have come off less than about 60 per cent.

Among those with declines of more than 90 per cent since their peak are leading uranium stocks. In their case, their peak was back in 2007. Producer Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) has come down from $18.92 then to $1.04 now. Paladin Energy (PDN) hit $10.80 back in 2007 and now sits at 94c. Bannerman Resources (BMN) with its Namibia project was a star back then at a high of $4.14, now at 5.8c…..”

Strong Aboriginal resistance to Toro Energy’s Wiluna uranium project

May 23, 2013

We must note that approval for this project does not mean that the deal is done and dusted. Activists should take inspiration from the recent campaign at James Price Point which saw Woodside forced to shelve its plans for a gas hub there. In that case an organised community campaign pushed the big business interests back.

Labor approves WA’s first uranium mine, Socialist Party, 10 May 13,  Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke gave the go ahead to Toro’s $270 million uranium mining project in the Wiluna region of Western Australia last month. This decision has angered many people across the state especially the local aboriginal community – the Wiluna and Tarpla people.

Wiluna elder, Glen Cooke, said “Uranium should stay in the ground. It can hurt our Country, the environment, our people, our children, our children’s children”.

Toro Energy has plans afoot for two open-cut mines at Centipede and Lake Way producing at least 780 tonnes of uranium oxide a year for at least 14 years. Uranium can provide the raw material for nuclear reactors as well as for nuclear weapons. Every month three trucks will carry concentrated powered ore 2,700 km to the port of Adelaide.

Uranium mining has been responsible for the largest collective exposure of workers to radiation. One estimate puts the number of workers who have died of lung cancer and silicosis due to mining at 20,000. Low level radiation is also implicated in birth defects, high infant mortality and chronic lung, eye, skin and reproductive illnesses.

There are two main problems with the uranium mining and the nuclear Industry. Firstly there is the danger of monumental disasters. Secondly there is the unresolved issue of how to safely store nuclear waste.

In less than 60 years of nuclear power generation there have been four major nuclear incidents – Windscale (now Sellafield in the UK), Three Mile Island in the US, Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union, and Fukushima in Japan. These have been caused by a combination of human error and technical failure. There is no reason to think others can not happen again in the future…….

The truth is that approval for this project has nothing to do with jobs or benefits for local communities. The ALP have ticked off this project so that their rich mates in the mining sector can profit at the expense of workers, the environment and community safety.

We must note that approval for this project does not mean that the deal is done and dusted. Activists should take inspiration from the recent campaign at James Price Point which saw Woodside forced to shelve its plans for a gas hub there. In that case an organised community campaign pushed the big business interests back…… http://www.socialistpartyaustralia.org/archives/5188

Yes, the Paydirt Uranium Conference WAS a dud

May 23, 2013

Uranium sales to India fuel nuclear arms fears 6 MAY 2013  KAREN ASHFORD, SBS  Negotiations to launch Australian uranium exports to India have begun, a move welcomed by the industry at its annual conference in Adelaide…..

……The Gillard government is going down the same route as the US and Canada, circumventing the nuclear non-proliferation treaty y instead striking a bilateral agreement containing safeguards guaranteeing how Australian uranium will be used.

it wasn’t just the protestors who were missing from this year’s Paydirt Uranium Conference in Adelaide. Delegates were scarce too – just 35 peppered the venue, the empty chairs reflective of the post-Fukushima doldrums that have gripped the sector.

A significant number of existing and planned reactors worldwide have been shut down or delayed in response to the disaster as nations reconsider their use of atomic energy, leading to depressed uranium prices and a general industry slowdown……http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1763258/Uranium-sales-to-India-fuel-nuclear-arms-fears

Exposing uranium industry’s inflated claims about economy, employment, in Australia

May 23, 2013
AUSTRALIA’S URANIUM EXPORT REVENUE IN PERSPECTIVE  YELLOWCAKE FEVER Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths , Australian Conservation Foundation “…..IBISWorld’s market report (March 2013) states there are just 650 jobs across Australia in uranium mining.  In May 2006, the federal Department of Industry,  Tourism and Resources estimated “over 700 jobs” in  uranium mining and in October 2007 the Department’s
estimate was “over 800 jobs”. The World Nuclear  Association puts the figure at 1,760 jobs (1,200 in  mining, 500 in exploration and 60 in regulation).
Even the higher World Nuclear Association figure  represents just 0.015% of all jobs in Australia2 and considerably less than 1% of jobs in  mining, oil and gas operations (while all mining  accounts for about 2% of the total workforce). Prime Minister Julia Gillard puts the figure at “over  4,200 jobs” in uranium mining in Australia – presumably  using a 1,400 x 3 multiplier for indirect jobs. Yet Dr  David Gruen from the Macroeconomic Group at  Treasury states that “with unemployment close to  its lowest sustainable rate, it is not the case that  individual industries are creating jobs, they are simply  re-distributing them … there really isn’t a multiplier’’.
Inflated claims and estimates of uranium employment  are neither new nor the domain of one political party.  In 1988, Labor MHR Gordon Bilney claimed that  the unfettered expansion of the uranium industry  would generate 250,000 new jobs. In 2012, Premier  Campbell Newman stated the industry would generate  “thousands of jobs” in Queensland despite not having  any economic analysis to justify this implausible claim.
The Australian Uranium Association claims the  industry is a “significant employer of First Australians,  with some workforces comprising up to 15 per cent  indigenous employees.” In order to better reflect the  Indigenous employment variance between projects, if  we apply a 5% discount rate to the Association’s claim  and assume that Indigenous people comprise 10%  of the uranium workforce (still a generous estimate),  and if we take the highest of the available estimates  of total employment (1,760), that amounts to 176  jobs or roughly one job for every 3,000 Indigenous  Australians – hardly a fast track to closing the gap.  And this is before Dr Gruen’s point about redistribution  is considered in the employment equation…. http://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACF_Yellowcake_Fever.pdf

Australia’s investors in uranium have been burned

May 23, 2013

Last year the Olympic Dam expansion was cancelled, BHP disbanded its uranium division and sold the Yeelirrie uranium lease in Western Australia for about 11 per cent of the nominal value of the resource.

Also indicative of the state of the industry was Cameco’s announcement in February of a $162.5 million write-down on the Kintyre project in Western Australia. Just months after first production at the Honeymoon mine in north-east SA in September 2011, project partner Mitsui announced its decision to withdraw as it “could not foresee sufficient economic return from the project”.

In addition to industry propaganda, governments routinely inflate the significance and potential of the uranium industry, as do industry “analysts” (some of them market traders), some business journalists and some academics. There are real-world consequences to uranium mania — many “mum and dad” retail investors have been burned, especially during the speculative price bubble in the mid-2000s.

Uranium Industry Dreams Of Paydirt   http://newmatilda.com/2013/05/02/uranium-industry-dreams-paydirt   By Jim Green, 2 May 13,   A new report released by the Australian Conservation Foundation: Yellowcake Fever: Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths, shows that uranium accounted for just 0.29 per cent of Australia’s export revenue in the 10 years from 2002−2011. In the last financial year, uranium revenue of $607 million was 103 times lower than the biggest earner, iron ore. Milk and cream generate twice as much export revenue as uranium — and can’t be turned into Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Uranium export revenue is still more underwhelming given that the four companies mining uranium in Australia are all either majority foreign owned or 100 per cent foreign owned; in other words, a sizeable proportion of that export revenue never leaves the Northern Hemisphere and never comes anywhere near Australia.

By the highest estimate, uranium mining and exploration accounts for 1,760 jobs in Australia — just 0.015 per cent of all jobs. The Australian Uranium Association claims the industry is a “significant employer of First Australians” but in fact it provides just one job for every 3,000 Indigenous Australians.

Uranium mania reached its zenith in the mid-2000s due to a spectacular price bubble which saw the spot price peak at US$138 per pound in June 2007. Since the bubble burst, the uranium industry has been battered as a result of falling prices, the Global Financial Crisis, the failure of the nuclear power “renaissance” to materialise, and serious problems and production shortfalls at Australia’s operating uranium mines.

Since March 2011 the fallout from the Fukushima disaster in Japan (a disaster that was directly fuelled by Australian uranium) has compounded the industry’s problems. In 2006, The Bulletin magazine spoke of a “radioactive heaven” but by late 2011 The Australian described the sector as passing through Death Valley.

A major constraint is the modest size of the global market for uranium. The value of global uranium demand is around $9.6 billion annually. Even if Australia were the world’s sole uranium supplier, uranium revenue would fall short of that from iron ore by a factor of 6.5.

With nine countries producing over 1000 tonnes of uranium annually and 10 countries producing smaller quantities, uranium accounts for a significant fraction of export revenue in just one country — Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan accounted for 36 per cent of global production in 2011, and thus uranium was a significant contributor to the country’s modest national economy and export revenue.

Australia has around 31 per cent of the world’s known recoverable uranium resources (to US$130/kg). However a majority of that uranium is in one location — BHP Billiton’s Olympic Dam mine. Last year the Olympic Dam expansion was cancelled, BHP disbanded its uranium division and sold the Yeelirrie uranium lease in Western Australia for about 11 per cent of the nominal value of the resource.

Also indicative of the state of the industry was Cameco’s announcement in February of a $162.5 million write-down on the Kintyre project in Western Australia. Just months after first production at the Honeymoon mine in north-east SA in September 2011, project partner Mitsui announced its decision to withdraw as it “could not foresee sufficient economic return from the project”.

In addition to industry propaganda, governments routinely inflate the significance and potential of the uranium industry, as do industry “analysts” (some of them market traders), some business journalists and some academics. There are real-world consequences to uranium mania — many “mum and dad” retail investors have been burned, especially during the speculative price bubble in the mid-2000s.

An independent inquiry is long overdue to objectively weigh the uranium industry’s economic benefits against its effects on environmental and public health, safety and security, particularly in the shadow of Fukushima.

Australia’s uranium exports a poor contributor to the economy

May 23, 2013
AUSTRALIA’S URANIUM EXPORT REVENUE IN PERSPECTIVE  YELLOWCAKE FEVER Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths , Australian Conservation Foundation A serious constraint is the modest size of the global market for uranium. Even if all secondary supply is bundled  into the primary market, and lower spot prices are ignored, the figure still falls short of $10 billion p.a:
The claims of mining advocates about the economic benefits to Australia from uranium mining need to  be tempered by consideration of the high level of foreign ownership. Of the four companies producing  uranium as of March 2013: BHP Billiton (Olympic Dam) is 76% foreign-owned, Rio Tinto (Ranger)  83%, General Atomics/Heathgate Resources (Beverley) 100%, and Uranium One (Honeymoon)
100%.1
 There is also considerable foreign ownership of uranium exploration companies.
Much has been written about the mixed economic effects of Australia’s mining boom. Negative impacts include
upward pressure on exchange rates; driving up the costs of skilled labour for businesses in other sectors;
driving up the prices of raw materials used in mining (for example concrete and steel); driving up the cost of
other services (for example construction). However the uranium industry could not be accused of contributing to
those negative impacts to any significant degree – its economic impacts, positive and negative, are minimal.  http://www.acfonline.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/ACF_Yellowcake_Fever.pdf

AUDIO: exposing the diseconomics of Australia’s uranium industry

May 23, 2013
AUDIO Australia’s uranium industry is high risk, low return, says campaigner http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/connect-asia/australias-uranium-industry-is-high-risk-low-return-says-campaigner/1123008?autoplay=1122972  29 April 2013 Australia’s uranium industry is high risk, low return: that’s the assessment of a report designed to expose the uranium industry’s promise of great economic reward. Its findings suggest uranium accounted for just 0.29 per cent of Australia’s export revenue between 2002 and 2011. 

The report by the Australian Conservation Foundation calls for a national independent inquiry into the industry’s contribution to Australia’s economy and employment.The report comes as uranium advocates meet in Adelaide today for the annual Paydirt Uranium Conference.

Presenter: Richard Ewart

Speaker: Dr Jim Green, national anti-nuclear campaigner for Friends of the Earth in Melbourne and co-author of the report, ‘Yellowcake Fever: Exposing the Uranium Industry’s Economic Myths’

Excerpts from this audio discussion

Uranium mining is a negligible component of Australia’s export industry…………..Government is listening to corporate interests.
Almost all of Western Autralia’s uranium projects are on hold.
 88% of Australians think we should sell uranium only to countries that are part of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty
The Uranium Paydirt Conference in Adelaide is bound to hype up the uranium market.  But the  nuclear renaissance never happened…….Uranium exports would need to double to catch up to Australia’s exports of milk and cream. …..Globally uranium is  a small industry. The  hype is not matched by reality
Where is nuclear power sector going in Asia?
One or two countries will develop nuclear power for the first time. Vietnam  apossibility. Indonesia not likley Growth in India and China from  a very low base – modest growth that will be offset by decline in Europe and stagnation in North America. Both countries  have a long history of exaggerated claims about nuclear growth.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.