Archive for the ‘opposition to u-mining’ Category

Keep moratorium on uranium mining, say 70 Virginia organisations

November 4, 2011

“They want good quality jobs and they see a uranium mine as a deterrent to economic development,”

The Sierra Club said the NAACP is among 70 organizations and localities that want the ban to remain in place.

NAACP: Keep Va. ban on uranium mining, Canadian Business, By Steve Szkotak  October 31, 2011 RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The state chapter of the NAACP wants Virginia to keep intact a 30-year ban on uranium mining, stating that opening one of the world’s largest known deposits of the radioactive ore is not worth the environmental risk. (more…)

Expanded uranium mine at Roxby Downs opposed by Aborigines and conservationists

October 16, 2011

Conservation and Aboriginal groups upset about BHP mine expansion, ABC Rural News, By Kendall Jackson, 11/10/2011  One of the world’s most significant mine expansions is another step closer to construction in South Australia, but there’s still plenty of opposition to it………..the environmental approval has locals fearing the expansion, especially the construction of a desalination plant in upper Spencer Gulf.

Whyalla diver Tony Bramley fears any change in salinity levels in the gulf could be fatal to the giant Australian cuttlefish, which aggregate in the area to breed each year.

“We just don’t know too much about what happens underwater,” he said.
“Even though this area is more studied than anywhere else in the state, we’ve got to the point now where we realise just how much we don’t know.”

A spokesman for the Arabunna people says the environmental approval is a sad day for Aboriginal people in the region.

Aboriginal elder Kevin Buzzacott says the site holds historical significance and the Aboriginal community has been left out of the consultation process.
“We don’t want that big great gaping hole in the desert, we just don’t want it,” he said.

“We never wanted Olympic Dam in the first place because it’s a sacred site and we’re trying to protect our areas.”
The Conservation Council in South Australia is concerned the company hasn’t done enough to reduce its carbon footprint, with the expansion of the Olympic Dam mine.

The council says the project will increase the state’s energy demand by about 40 per cent.
Julia Winefield, from the council, says BHP Billiton has only committed to less than 7 per cent of the expanded mine using renewable energy.

“We think for a company that has recorded $23 billion worth of profits in the last financial year they can probably afford to do a bit better than that,” she said. “We think they have a moral and social responsibility to do a lot better than that.”

Responses to Australian governments approving BHP’s Olympic Dam uranium mine expansion

October 16, 2011

Facts and responses on Australian government approvals for expanded Olympic Dam uranium mine

By Christina MacPherson

Olympic Dam mega-mine brings wealth and warnings, :The Australian, MICHAEL OWEN, SA POLITICAL REPORTER,October 11, 2011 “………The existing underground mine, near Roxby Downs in the remote centre of South Australia, will be replaced with an open-pit forecast to be more than 4km long, 3.5km wide and 1km deep, and will produce about 750,000 tonnes of copper and about 19,000 tonnes of uranium oxide a year.

A new waste rock facility will cover almost 7000ha and reach a height of 150m, while tailings storage will use eight new pods, each 65m tall and covering 2sq km. Aside from the new open pit mine, BHP will expand its smelter and build new ore processing and export plants……

The Greens declared the approved expansion a “radioactive waste mountain range” and a disaster for the environment, human health and local employment. “The so-called environment conditions are hopeless – there’s no requirement for this tailing heap to be covered while the mine operates, and it is to operate for at least another 30 years,” Greens nuclear spokesman Scott Ludlam said.

“The new open pit will leak up to 8 million litres of liquid radioactive waste a day by 2020 from the tailings storage facility.”…. Senator Ludlam said Labor governments had left South Australia with a “toxic legacy”.

“Instead of burying the radioactive tailings waste in a properly lined pit, BHP Billiton will dump 70 million tonnes of finely powdered radioactive tailings over an area of 44sqkm; that isn’t a radioactive waste heap, that’s a radioactive waste mountain range,” he said.

South Australian Greens MP Mark Parnell said Labor wanted the project so much it was “prepared to let BHP dictate whatever terms it likes”.

Greens say Olympic Dam expansion a health threat, ABC News, Nance Haxton,  October 11, 2011 The Greens say the decision to give the go-ahead for the world’s largest copper and uranium mine will result in enormous harm to public health. The Federal, South Australian and Northern Territory governments have given environmental approval for the expansion of the Olympic Dam mine in South Australia’s north. BHP Billiton’s proposed mine expansion near Roxby Downs has been approved under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

But Greens spokesman Scott Ludlam says the giant tailings dam that BHP Billiton plans for the expansion will eventually contain millions of tonnes of carcinogens, which throws some doubt over whether the crucial Indenture Act will pass the South Australian Parliament. ”For the Environment Minister to say that that’s appropriate for that material to be blowing around on the surface for all time is absolutely extraordinary,” Mr Ludlam said……..

Indenture Act doubts The Indenture Act is yet to be finalised and signed and will include final details such as royalties and how much local companies will be involved in construction….. Once the Government finalises the Indenture Act it is up to BHP Billiton to sign the agreement.

Mike Rann’s last day as Premier is October 20, and with his much publicised preference to have negotiations finalised before he steps down, it is clear the Indenture Act will be complete before then. Once signed the Act will be presented to the South Australian Parliament for approval……

Concerns South Australian Greens Leader Mark Parnell says they still have grave concerns about the project and their approval is far from assured. “We’re talking about the biggest industrial project in this state’s history and we have to get it right,” he said. ”We’re not interested in meeting any artificial timelines that the outgoing Premier may have announced. We want to get this right.”

Another significant aspect is the expansion of the uranium mining operation, exporting 19,000 tonnes of uranium oxide a year through ports in Darwin or Adelaide. Mr Ludlam says the environmental approval process is a disgrace. ”At Kakadu National Park in the Northern Territory the company has an obligation to isolate the tailings, put them back into the pit and look after them for 10,000 years. That’s actually written into their licence condition,” he said.

“In South Australia the company will be allowed to dump a vastly larger volume of carcinogenic tailings and leave them on the surface and walk away. That’s an extraordinary public hazard lying there essentially for all time.” Part of the approval process requires BHP to significantly start construction within the next five years.

BHP Billiton’s board will make a final decision on whether to proceed by Easter next year. Mr Koutsantonis says if they decide not to go ahead all environmental approvals will lapse and the process will effectively start again……http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-10-10/greens-say-olympic-dam-expansion-is-a-health-threat/3459778    don’t use

BHP’s $45b giant: the bigger,deeeper Olympic Dam, SMH, David Wroe October 11, 2011

THE massive planned expansion of BHP Billiton’s Olympic Dam mine would plague South Australia with radioactive waste and water overuse, say green groups, dismissing government assurances of strict evironmental standards. After both the federal and South Australian governments gave the go-ahead to the expansion of the copper and uranium mine about 550 kilometres north of Adelaide yesterday, environmentalists and the Greens blasted BHP Billiton’s plans.

The expansion will increase sixfold the amount of ore retrieved from Olympic Dam, making it the biggest open-cut mine in the world…… BHP Billiton would have to establish a biodiversity conservation area of 140,000 hectares and submit detailed environmental and water management plans to the minister for approval…..

BHP Billiton will now decide whether to accept the conditions and go ahead with the expansion….. the Greens spokesman on nuclear issues, Senator Scott Ludlam, said the expansion would create a ”carcinogenic mountain range”.

The waste from the uranium extraction and processing, known as tailings, would be left on the surface rather than buried in a lined pit, he said. ”That isn’t a radioactive waste heap – that’s a radioactive waste mountain range. The so-called environment conditions are hopeless – there’s no requirement for this tailing heap to be covered while the mine operates.”

Dave Sweeney, national nuclear campaigner with the Australian Conservation Foundation, also attacked the plans. ”It’s a deeply disappointing decision that will see significant adverse environmental damage at that site, particularly the large volumes of unsustainable water use and the generation of long- lived radioactive waste with minimal management that poses effectively perpetual pollution.”

The mine’s need for water will rise from 42 million litres a day to an average of 240 million litres……

Willem Vervoort, professor of Hydrology at the University of Sydney, who has followed the plans, said he understood environmental concerns had to be balanced against economic opportunities but said BHP Billiton was missing an opportunity by not ending its use of Great Artesian Basin water altogether.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/water-issues/bhps-45b-giant-the-bigger-deeper-olympic-dam-20111010-1lhly.html#ixzz1aV5rvc00

 BHP says “Jump”  ”How high” says South Australian govt  Mark Parnell, 10 Oct 11 Today’s approval of the Olympic Dam Expansion is not surprising; what’s surprising is how weak the Government’s conditions are, say the Greens. “These so-called ‘stringent’ conditions are nothing more than a re-hashing of all the weak commitments that BHP Billiton has already promised for years,” said Greens Parliamentary Leader Mark Parnell.

 “Today’s assessment report shows this project will be worlds away from ‘world’s best environmental practice’.  “This ridiculous spin from the State and Federal Governments has got to stop. It does no-one any credit. “They should just be honest and say ‘we want this project too much and we’re prepared to let BHPB dictate whatever terms it likes in order to get it’,” he said.

The Greens will insist on a decent debate in State Parliament to scrutinise the hundreds of pages expected in the project’s Indenture Agreement.“The Government must not rush the approval legislation for the Olympic Dam Expansion through State Parliament to meet an artificial deadline of its own making,” Mr Parnell said.

“Pretty much everything the world’s richest resource company has asked for they have been given by a State Government desperate to ink a contract before the Premier departs. “Parliament must not be a mere rubber stamp in the same way that this Government has been,” he said.

BHP clears approval hurdles for $20b Olympic Dam, The Age, October 10, 2011  Global miner BHP Billiton secured environmental approval from the South Australian government on Monday for an estimated $20 billion expansion of its massive Olympic Dam copper and uranium mine.

BHP Billiton is expected to give the final go-ahead for the project by June 2012. It has yet to reveal the cost of the expansion but analysts rank it as possibly the single biggest on the drawing board of the world’s biggest miner.The state approval comes only hours after the federal government also gave the project the environmental go-ahead.


The South Australia state government, in announcing the project’s key approval, made it a condition that the company must start project construction within five years. It also said it aimed to finalise an agreement on royalties and infrastructure commitments for the expansion by October 20. ”I anticipate an agreement can be reached soon,” Tom Koutsantonis, the state’s minister for mineral resources development, said in a statement…e: http://www.theage.com.au/business/bhp-clears-approval-hurdles-for-20b-olympic-dam-20111010-1lh1w.html#ixzz1aQlc8HNa

Olympic Dam Nation, Nectaria Calan,10 oct 11, “If we don’t do something, South Austalia’s going to cop it,” stated Uncle Kevin Buzzacott, an Arabunna elder from the Lake Eyre region, at a public forum about the Olympic Dam expansion titled ‘Olympic Dam Nation: The impacts of uranium mining from Olympic Dam to Fukushima.’ The forum was held yesterday afternoon in Adelaide. Forum organisers were pleased with the community response.

 Dr Gavin Mudd, hydrogeologist from Monash University, discussed the environmental impacts of the mine on the mound springs in the Lake Eyre region, in the context of the proposed increase in water extraction from the Great Artesian Basin from the current 37 million litres of water per day to 42 million litres per day.

Dr Jochen Kaempf, lecturer and researcher in oceanography at Flinders University, outlined the long term impacts of brine from the proposed desalination plant on the marine ecosystem.

David Noonan, nuclear–free campaigner, outlined the impact of 44 square kilometers of radioactive tailings dams and Australia’s contribution to the nuclear fuel chain.

Mark Parnell, member of the Legislative Council for the Greens, discussed the Roxby Downs Indenture Act, a contract between BHP and the South Australian Government  which overrides several state laws.

“It’s clear the public are only being told a fraction of the story,” said forum organiser Nathan Adams. “BHP and the South Australian government are painting a rosy picture of the Olympic Dam expansion and today we have heard the ugly truth.”

“Today we learned that the proposed desalination plant will cause irreversible damage to the marine ecosystems of the Upper Spencer Gulf. The new mine will cause the health of the mound springs at Lake Eyre to continue to decline, and it’s tailing dams will leak 8 million litres of radioactive waste per day for the first decade of the mines life,” said Mr Adams.

A community rally will be held on the 20th of October to coincide with BHP Billiton’s London Annual General Meeting. Rally organisers aim to send a clear message to the government and BHP that the community is in opposition to the proposed expansion.

Pressure on BHP’s water use, as Olympic Dam mine set to expand, ABC Rural By Warwick Long, 10/10/2011 An announcement about the future of BHP Billiton’s planned expansion of the Olympic Dam Mine will happen today.The report on the environmental impact for the project will be made public by the South Australian Government at 2 p.m. central time.

Campaigners say the government should use this step to review BHP’s water use, particularly from the Great Artesian Basin. Independent Senator Nick Xenophon says the company, which is building its own desalination plant, should stop using artesian water. ”I think they need to wean themselves off it,” he said. ”That’s the issue, and using the full extent of 42 million litres a day for year after year, I don’t think is the right thing to do.”If there is an alternative source, then they should go to that alternative source.” http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201110/s3335889.htm

Virginia Beach officials want to keep moratorium on uranium mining

October 16, 2011

Virginia Beach officials want uranium mine ban extended, By Julian Walker The Virginian-Pilot, October 13, 2011 VIRGINIA BEACH Concerned that a proposed uranium mining operation could taint the city’s water supply, Virginia Beach officials want the state to maintain an existing moratorium on that activity for at least another year.

In a letter this week, the city’s water task force asked Mayor Will Sessoms and the City Council to urge the General Assembly to keep Virginia’s long-standing mining ban in place until at least 2013 and to delay related regulatory action. City officials are already on record opposing mining until they’re satisfied it won’t threaten Lake Gaston, a key drinking water source.

Some studies have said flooding near the mine could wash radioactive contaminants into tributaries that feed Lake Gaston, though a pro-mining analysis concluded that is highly unlikely. Forces for and against lifting the nearly three decade-old ban are bracing for a battle on the subject as early at the 2012 state legislative session. A National Academy of Sciences study on mining should be publicly released by then.

Virginia Uranium, the company that wants to extract ore from a Pittsylvania County uranium deposit, has actively lobbied officials as it pursues permission to mine, sending some to foreign countries to observe mines there. http://hamptonroads.com/2011/10/virginia-beach-officials-want-uranium-mine-ban-extended

Strong objections to Toro Energy’s plan to mine uranium at Wiluna, Western Australia

September 9, 2011

Key concerns with Toro’s plan to mine uranium at Wiluna, 
by Mia Pepper and Jim Green, 9 sept 11,

Traditional Owners are opposed to the construction of a uranium mine at
the significant sacred site of Lake Way. Toro has not completed
Archeological and Ethnographic studies and does not already have a
comprehensive Aboriginal Heritage Management Plan.

* Uranium exported from Wiluna will at best end up as high-level nuclear
waste. At worst it will end up as fissile (explosive) material in nuclear
weapons, or in a nuclear disaster such as that unfolding in Fukushima,
Japan.

Toro does not accept responsibility for its own application, stating
that it has “not fully verified the accuracy or completeness” of its
application.

* Lake Way is home to a unique population of Stygofauna − a
newly-discovered species of subterranean crustaceans.

* Toro has not factored in recent advice from the International Commission
on Radiological Protection that radon is twice as carcinogenic as
previously thought.

Transport plans are presented as a “preliminary draft” and the company
plans to transport its toxic, radioactive product over many thousands of
kilometres, from Wiluna to Adelaide and Darwin.

* Uranium mining and tailings disposal in this region will occur below the
water-table and will be connected to aquatic ecosystems. There is a
significant risk of contaminating the aquatic ecosystems with changes in
water chemistry, including the mobilisation of radioactive compounds.

* The legal requirement for tailings management at the Ranger uranium mine
in the NT is effective isolation for at least 10,000 years. The minimum
standard should be the same for Wiluna.

* There has not been a calcrete uranium deposit mined in Australia and
there is only one calcrete deposit presently being mined worldwide. There
is a lack of expertise and experience in engineering and mine design for
these deposits.

* Wiluna has a number of operating mines close to town and in the region.
Despite current mining activity, Wiluna still suffers from extreme
poverty, homelessness, unemployment, violence and other social problems.

www.ccwa.org.au/campaigns/nuclear-free-wa

Strong resistance to new uranium mining in Colorado

September 9, 2011

Opponents not only want the DOE to reject new uranium mining in the area, they also want past contamination cleaned up.

DOE gets an earful on uranium mine leasing program near Telluride, Montrose, Colorado Independent, By David O. Williams | 08.17.11 Depends where you were last week when the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) took feedback on its uranium mine leasing program in southwest Colorado. In some places like Telluride, according to media reports, the feds met with stiff resistance…..

In the nearby ski town of Telluride, according to the Telluride Daily Planet, the DOE “received a sharp mandate from Telluride residents: Any mining is too much, and its leasing program should be disbanded.”….

Opponents not only want the DOE to reject new uranium mining in the area, they also want past contamination cleaned up.

“Instead of promoting mining when DOE has plentiful uranium stockpiles, the public has requested DOE turn its focus to the environmental and economic benefits that would flow from requiring the immediate and comprehensive reclamation of 13 of the leased tracts,” said Hillary White of Sheep Mountain Alliance. “This would require no federal monies as the reclamation responsibilities must be met by the private companies who leased these tracts.”

As Telluride Town Council member David Oyster spoke out against the leasing program, demonstrators at the Telluride meeting donned black hoods in honor of those killed in nuclear bomb attacks or nuclear accidents. Some of the uranium used in the nation’s first nuclear bombs came from the Uravan Mineral Belt in Colorado…..

The ULP program includes the renewal of 13 previously active leases that were mined but not reclaimed and 18 new leases and would allow mining for up to 10 years. Critics claim uranium tailings have already fouled the scenic Dolores and San Miguel Rivers, both popular fishing and rafting destinations.

“Pollution from uranium development can be fatal for people, fish and wildlife, and can last for hundreds and even thousands of years,” said Taylor McKinnon of the Center for Biological Diversity. “The Department of Energy works for the public and the public is right to insist on reclamation rather than more uranium pollution. It’s time for the government to start listening.”…. http://coloradoindependent.com/96510/doe-gets-an-earful-on-uranium-mine-leasing-program-near-telluride-montrose

Uranium conference in Western Australia confronted by anti nuclear protest

July 30, 2011

Anti-uranium protest in Fremantle, Anti-uranium campaigners have staged a protest outside Australia’s largest annual uranium conference., ABC News, July 21, 2011 “…….Politicians and uranium industry delegates are attending the forum to discuss the future of the industry in WA, which as yet has no operational uranium mine.

The Conservation Council of WA organised the rally, which included Australian Manufacturing Workers Union WA boss Steve McCartney, Greens MP Robin Chapple and Fremantle Mayor Brad Pettitte.

The protesters say they hope to draw attention to the decline in the nuclear industry and reflect on the recent tragedy at the Fukushima plant in Japan…

Lynas Malaysian plant – there’s little confidence in IAEA’s safety review

July 9, 2011

“How can we monitor daily? The risks of human error are too high,” she said, pointing out that the half-life of thorium was 14 billion years…..Fuziah promised that if the report from the panel, which includes members of the IAEA, was as she anticipated, she will continue to bring the issue to a higher level and exert pressure on authorities.

No confidence in Lynas safety review’, Free Malaysia Today Tashny Sukumaran,  June 20, 2011, The IAEA report on the Lynas Corp is bound to be slanted and the human factor will not be taken into account, says Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh. KUALA LUMPUR: Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh is already second guessing the International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) report on the Lynas Corp’s rare earth refinery in Gebeng, Pahang. (more…)

Halifax Council firmly against uranium mining in Virginia

July 9, 2011

Halifax Council to step up opposition to uranium mining  The Gazette Virginian  8 July 11, Halifax Town Council is set to take a firm stand opposing uranium mining in nearby Pittsylvania County.

At its monthly work session Wednesday night at Halifax Town Hall, council discussed possible strategies to get out the word on the hazards uranium mining presents to the county’s water sources.

Council had requested the county to include the Virginia Beach study, “A Preliminary Assessment of Potential Impacts of Uranium Mining in Virginia on Drinking Water Sources,” in the regional water supply plan. The county board of supervisors approved the regional supply plan at its June 20 meeting with the Virginia Beach study included.

A number of councilmen attended the Pittsylvania County Board of Supervisors’ meeting Tuesday night that featured Tom Leahy, Virginia Beach director of public works, speaking on how the water system downstream from the uranium mining operation would be affected in the event of a disaster resulting in a spill at the mining site.
Councilman Jack Dunavant, chairman of the Current Affairs Committee, said Leahy has agreed to come to Halifax County to speak to citizens on the impact of uranium mining. ……http://www.gazettevirginian.com/index.php/news/34-news/3486-halifax-council-to-step-up-opposition-to-uranium-mining

Determined opposition to Lynas dumping radioactive wastes in Malaysia

May 30, 2011

crucial questions remain unanswered especially regarding the safe disposal of radioactive waste…… officials from the nuclear watchdog would be pro-nuclear and therefore fail to produce a fair assessment of the Lynas plant.

Calls for local and environmental groups to be represented in the monitoring team have also gone unheeded…’Whatever their findings, our final agenda – which is our ultimate goal – is to stop Lynas.’..

Malaysia’s new rare earth plant provokes radiation fears – Monsters and Critics, By Julia Yeow May 29, 2011, Kuala Lumpur - In the quiet town of Gebeng in Malaysia’s central state of Pahang, a new rare earth plant has evoked fears of radiation contamination as residents desperately seek to stop the construction of the world’s largest such refinery. (more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.