Archive for the ‘Powertech’ Category

Uranium mining for South Dakota very financially risky

April 28, 2013

We are being asked to take a huge risk with our water and environment with a company of very dubious financial stability

This market has fallen to about $40 per pound and may go lower

 We should not take this risk.

Uranium mine too great a risk for South Dakotahttp://www.mitchellrepublic.com/event/article/id/76549/group/homepage/Powertech (USA), Inc., a Canadian company with just 10 employees owned by a stock market hedge fund, is planning a massive uranium mining operation near Edgemont. By: Susan Henderson , 22 Feb 13, Powertech (USA), Inc., a Canadian company with just 10 employees owned by a stock market hedge fund, is planning a massive uranium mining operation near Edgemont. Last year, according to their unaudited financial report, they lost about $1.6 million. The top four officers are paid about $818,000. Powertech borrowed $7.5 million in exchange for stock from a unit of GDF Suez, a huge global utility whose stock went down 27 percent in the last year (see Financial Times, January 2013.) This move diluted the already troubled stock. About five years ago the Powertech stock was selling for $5.43 per share; currently it is about $0.12. Thus, stockholders who bought 100,000 shares for $543,000 now have an investment worth $12,000 — a huge loss. Powerful people in South Dakota, including legislators, government officials and local investors may have lost thousands. Understandably they want their money back.

 Powertech is in no position to promise South Dakota anything. After the various mining permits are granted they could sell the company. Our huge and valuable water permit can be sold also.

We are being asked to take a huge risk with our water and environment with a company of very dubious financial stability. Powertech has never managed any kind of uranium mine.

The uranium product “yellowcake” will be sold internationally, principally to China and India. This market has fallen to about $40 per pound and may go lower. France and Germany have decided to phase out nuclear power plants and China has recently announced it plans to greatly expand its use of solar and wind power. The Fukushima disaster has greatly affected this market.

“Yellowcake,” after refining, can be used to make nuclear weapons. Sales require an export license, which could be revoked at any time by our government if we became alarmed about its potential use in weapons. This would immediately cause huge financial strain on the Powertech operation.

Of the mineral leases in the Dewey-Burdock mine area of 10,500 acres, 37 percent are owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). No South Dakota sales taxes (4.5 percent, of which the state gets half) would be collected on yellowcake from these leases. The local tax revenue (2.25 percent) split between Custer and Fall River Counties might not even be enough to cover the damage to our local roads.

The North Dakota Bakken oil boom has not resulted in large-scale home purchasing by workers who do not want to be stuck with a local home once the boom is over. Uranium mining is not a long-term proposition and will likely play out the same way. I question the jobs and financial gain projections Powertech is making.

We should not take this risk.

EPA exempts uranium miners from bans on deep injection of radioactive wastes

December 28, 2012

Environmental groups say the EPA should not be letting mining companies write their own rules.

Similar disputes are erupting across the country.

“This is a health issue as much as a water supply issue,”

A Decades-Old Deal With Uranium Miners Is Causing Trouble For The EPA Abrahm Lustgarten, ProPublica | Dec. 26, 2012, GILLETTE, Wyo.“…….The problems and pressures the EPA is facing at Christensen Ranch are not unique.

With uranium mining booming, the agency has received a mounting number of requests for aquifer exemptions in recent years. So far, EPA records show, the agency has issued at least 40 exemptions for uranium mines across the country and is considering several more. Two mines are expanding operations near Christensen Ranch.

In several cases, the EPA has struggled to balance imposing water protections with accommodating the industry’s needs. (more…)

Threat to water from “in situ” uranium mining

January 8, 2011

“in-situ” technology, whereby treated water is pumped underground to dissolve uranium deposits. The water is then pumped to the surface, the uranium extracted and the water returned underground.
Opponents of the mine operation say the system threatens groundwater quality over vast areas around the mine

Powertech sues over water rules; residents want mining company to be accountable By Tom HackerLoveland Reporter-Herald, 11/12/2010 (more…)

Powertech Uranium wants to be able to pollute water – legally

January 8, 2011

Powertech Uranium Corp sues Colorado over northwestern Weld County site | Greeley Tribune, 14 Nov 10, A Canadian company seeking to mine uranium in northwestern Weld County has filed suit against the state of Colorado, claiming that recently adopted rules for keeping groundwater clean are unreasonable. (more…)

In-situ uranium mining hazards for Colorado

September 26, 2009

Hope won’t protect us from Powertech’s in situ uranium mining near Nunn
coloradean.com Sue Ramsay, September 22, 2009 “………. the documented facts of the history of contamination from in situ leach uranium mining such as that proposed by Powertech Uranium Corp. in Weld County.  (more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.