Archive for the ‘Yeelirrie’ Category

Yeelirrie uranium project staff being moved elsewhere

July 9, 2011

Query on Yeelirrie after BHP moves PETER KLINGER, The West Australian, June 20, 2011A fortnight after admitting it had put the Yeelirrie environmental approvals process on hold, BHP Billiton is understood to have begun dismantling the senior management team charged with overseeing WA’s biggest uranium development.

The management changes have increased speculation that BHP is considering severing ties with Yeelirrie, south of Wiluna, because it does not fit the miner’s focus on tier-one assets. It is understood the positions of Yeelirrie project director and general manager are under review amid unconfirmed reports several other key members of the Yeelirrie team have either left or been reassigned elsewhere within BHP……..
The miner is under enormous pressure from investors to find and develop projects that will make a material difference to its top and bottom lines, Complicating the matter for BHP is that development of Yeelirrie would create significant political and community backlash in WA, where there is vocal opposition to uranium mining, in return for only modest financial rewards for the world’s biggest miner…..http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/business/a/-/wa/9669593/query-on-yeelirrie-after-bhp-moves/

BHP’s Yeelirrie uranium project likely to fizzle out

July 9, 2011

“the nuclear industry is increasingly unpopular and unprofitable and BHP Billiton has seen the writing on the wall for the uranium trade in WA”.

BHP’s Yeelirrie doubts reflect high risk and low return from uranium mining,  20 June 11,  WA’s peak environment group today welcomed news that BHP Billiton’s Yeelirrie uranium mining project is indefinitely on hold, with growing speculation that BHP will pull out of the project altogether. (more…)

Shareholder opposition to BHP’s uranium mining projects

January 8, 2011

The production of radioactive tailings waste is projected to increase from 10million tonnes each year to 68million tonnes. The tailings dams now rise more than 20m above the landscape and cover many square kilometres. BHP Billiton intends these tailings piles to increase to 60m high and to cover up to 44sqkm.

BHP Billiton’s uranium quest has too many risks  John Poppins, Canberra Times, Nov 15, 2010 Thousands of ordinary Australians, including my own family have benefited from BHP Billiton’s mining success. However, like increasing numbers of BHP Billiton shareholders, we are troubled by the long-term effects of some aspects of its mining projects. (more…)

Protest against uranium mining at Yeelirrie

January 8, 2011

The WA mining industry, and BHP in particular, has a poor worker safety record and uranium mining poses even greater health risks as uranium mine workers are exposed to radiation from the ore itself and from the inhalation of radon gas,”

Anger at BHP’s Yeelirrie uranium project  Perth Now Russell Quinn & Rebecca Lawson,  November 16, 2010 BHP Billiton has met with opposition from traditional owners over the development of the proposed Yeelirrie uranium mine at its annual general meeting in Perth today. (more…)

How to get your uranium mine approved – stack the panel!

October 7, 2010

We still do not know whether or how key issues – such as workers’ health and safety, tailings rehabilitation, transport and groundwater impacts – will be addressed by the panel. We fear that crucial issues, such as impacts on workers’ health and communities and nuclear weapons proliferation, will not be addressed at all.

The panel excludes experts in relevant areas such as occupational health and safety, transport, Aboriginal heritage and native title, non-proliferation and safeguards.

Uranium industry’s record raises doubts, The West Australian, By Mia Pepper, September 16th, 2010, The Barnett Government recently announced that the Australian Centre for Geomechanics had won a tender to form an “independent panel on uranium mining regulations”. Sitting on the panel are pro-nuclear lobbyists and behind the scenes are corporate sponsors including some that are anything but independent. (more…)

Western Australia’s ‘independent’ Uranium mining ‘regulation panel’ stacked with vested interests

September 4, 2010

Sitting on the panel are pro-nuclear lobbyists and behind the scenes are corporate sponsors including some that are anything but independent. BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto are two of the sponsors − companies with operating uranium mines in Australia and uranium interests in WA.

Dodgy Dealings continue in the Uranium Industry, hi spirits: by Mia Pepper,   September 02, 2010, This week the Barnett Government announced that the Australian Centre for Geomechanics has won a tender to form an ‘independent panel on uranium mining regulations’. (more…)

Strong opposition to uranium mining in Western Australia

September 4, 2010

Kade Muir, a Wongatha anthropologist who was born in Kalgoorlie but now resides elsewhere, says, “We don’t want this product disturbed from the ground. We don’t want to bequeath a legacy for future generations of a toxic environment.”

Enough of Uranium Mining, Say Aboriginal Communities. Galdu. Resource Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, August 2010, KALGOORLIE-BOULDER, Australia — As a mining giant prepares to open a major uranium mining site in Western Australia next year, the clamour for the state to once more ban mining of the radioactive mineral has become louder.
By Jessie Boylan, IPS

In fact, the Wongatha Aboriginal clan that calls this region its home does not see any wisdom in having uranium mining in Australia at all. “We don’t need uranium mining in this country,” says Wongatha leader and pastor Geoffrey Stokes. “We have sun, we’ve got wind, we’ve got people. Why should we pollute our country for money?” …..
Western Australia is said to have a significant share of the country’s uranium reserves, but between 2002 and 2008, a state-wide ban on uranium mining was in force. The ban was lifted two years ago, when the Liberal Party was voted into power in the state.

Today, the Anti Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia says, more than 100 domestic and foreign companies are exploring for uranium all over Western Australia. ……
One of the industry’s major players, the Australian mining company BHP Billiton, already plans to develop the Yeelirrie uranium deposit here in 2011 in a 17 billion Australian dollar (15.6 U.S. billion dollar) project. The mine is set to operate in 2014, with an annual yield of 3,500 tonnes of uranium ore.

Kalgoorlie-Boulder itself is in what is called the ‘Goldfields’ region of Western Australia. The town of 30,000 exists purely around the mining industry. But many residents of Kalgoorie, some 600 kilometres east of the state capital, Perth, would rather not have anything to do with uranium.

Even Kade Muir, a Wongatha anthropologist who was born in Kalgoorlie but now resides elsewhere, says, “We don’t want this product disturbed from the ground. We don’t want to bequeath a legacy for future generations of a toxic environment.”

Such sentiments are echoed by the Labor Party, which had imposed a policy restricting uranium mining to just three locations in Australia at any one time when it led the federal government in the eighties.

Shadow Environment Minister Sally Talbot told protesters at an anti- uranium mining rally here in March: “We know that all mining is dangerous, but we know that mining uranium is off the scale. It presents an unacceptable hazard for workers in the industry, it presents an unacceptable risk to the future and well-being of our indigenous communities, and it presents a dreadful threat to our environment in Western Australia.”

Enough of Uranium Mining, Say Aboriginal Communities

W.A govt unhappy about BHP’s plans for transporting uranium via Kalgoorlie

June 12, 2010

Moore opposes yellowcake through Kalgoorlie, ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 21 May 2010 The Mines Minister, Norman Moore, says he does not support the transport of uranium through Kalgoorlie-Boulder.BHP Billiton is considering moving yellowcake from its planned Yeelirrie mine to Kalgoorlie where it would be temporarily stored before being sent by rail to either Adelaide or Darwin.

Mr Moore says he has asked BHP to consider bypassing the city and using the Parkeston rail terminal, north-east of Kalgoorlie, instead.

“As far as I’m concerned, it’s not going through any built-up areas in Kalgoorlie and it doesn’t need to.

“I said I will go away and find an alternative for you and we’ve identified some roads north of Kalgoorlie-Boulder city which could link up the Kalgoorlie-Leonora Road with Parkeston.”

Moore opposes yellowcake through Kalgoorlie – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Doubts on future of BHP’s Yeelirrie uranium project?

May 13, 2010

BHP says Western Australia uranium project ‘under review’ Mining Weekly  Esmarie Swanepoel 11th May 2010 PERTH  The world’s biggest diversified miner BHP Billiton plans to move its Yeelirrie uranium project, in Western Australia, to feasibility study stage by the end of this year, GM Andrew Shook said on Tuesday.

However, he told an uranium summit in Perth that the project was “under review”, following the government’s plan to introduce a 40% resources tax on super profits starting in 2012.

Yeelirrie is BHP’s second uranium project in Australia, following in the footsteps of Olympic Dam, in South Australia. BHP says Western Australia uranium project ‘under review’

BHP’s Yeelirrie uranium mine a threat to water

March 27, 2010

the report had “glazed over” a lot of the research into the mine’s potential environmental impact…”There’s potential for leakages and spills … there is a great concern for contamination of water.”

BHP uranium report unveils risks, MICHAEL BENNETT, The West Australian February 27, 2010,

BHP Billiton documents have revealed the company’s proposed $17 billion Yeelirrie uranium mine could threaten vulnerable animal species previously found in the area. (more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.