Archive for the ‘politics’ Category

EPA to receive appeal on rare earths transport, by Anti Nuclear Alliance of Western Australia

February 26, 2012

ANAWA is currently working with the Environmental Defenders Office (EDO) to lodge a referral to the EPA regarding the Lynas operations at Mt Weld and their mining of rare earths. Lynas has made a number of changes to their procedures, which have not gone through the appropriate approvals and they are currently operating under approvals given to them 14 years ago.

There are major concerns about the amounts of this radioactive substance being transported from Mt Weld to the ports of Fremantle and health & safety issues for those involved in handling the material that will be exported to their controversial processing plant in Malaysia.   ANAWA will be going to the EPA with the EDO lawyer Josie Walker on Tuesday the 28th of February at 10.30 am.

Australian uranium mining interests now stretch their tentacles to Greenland

February 26, 2012

Asian, European Firms Circle Greenland Mining Project, WSJ, By Robb M. Stewart, FEBRUARY 22, 2012, In one of the world’s coldest climates, competition to develop a future source of uranium and rare earths is heating up…. The impact of climate change has made mining in Greenland easier by melting permafrost, while the island’s growing autonomy from Denmark has enabled officials to award more exploration licenses….

The government of Greenland late last year amended the Perth-based Greenland Minerals & Energy company’s exploration license to include uranium, the first such permit for the nuclear fuel on the island. According to John Mair, the company’s executive director of business development, an attractive option as a strategic partner would be a consortium interested in rare earths as well as uranium…. http://blogs.wsj.com/dealjournalaustralia/2012/02/21/asian-european-firms-circle-greenland-mining-project/

In South Australia, BHP Billiton’s uranium interests direct government policy

February 26, 2012

Commercial vested interests of uranium mining companies are writing the script for Australia’s uranium sales deals under both Liberal and now ALP federal governments…….

South Australia should come to its senses and recognise our society’s responsibilities to get out of the uranium trade and not be made complicit in nuclear risks for BHP Billiton’s vested interests.

Our uranium fuelled Fukushima, David Noonan, The Guardian, 22 Feb 12 “……..How did the SA government perform in exercising their responsibilities after Fukushima? Indigenous people bear a disproportionate burden of impacts from uranium mining and this will certainly continue to be the case in SA
under the Roxby Indenture deal “negotiated” by the state with BHP Billiton that is being pushed through Parliament with bi-partisan support.

BHP Billiton is not bound by the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1988 in the “Stuart Shelf Area” of some 1.5 percent of the area of SA around the Olympic Dam mine.

Aboriginal heritage obligations that apply to every other miner or developer do not apply to the Big Australian for the 70-year extended period of the Roxby Indenture, and the state further agreed that this can only be changed in future with the agreement of the company. (more…)

Uranium miners exploit African countries in skewed contract deals

February 26, 2012

IGF’s views follow remarks by Reserve Bank of Malawi Governor Perks Ligoya last December during which he protested the generous allowances the Malawi government provided to Australia’s Paladin Energy in the Kayelekera uranium mining deal in Karonga.

Mining deals worry industry grouping The Daily Times,  21 February 2012  Isaac Masingati An international mining industry grouping, Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (IGF), says it is concerned with contracts between investors and governments especially in developing countries, saying they tend to be skewed in favour the investor.

IGF President Leonard Kalindekafe told the Business Times in Zomba on Friday that there was a concern among members of the grouping that some investors were taking advantage of governments’ lack of expertise to strike deals that bring little profits. ”This is a big concern to the Forum because some bona fide countries are not able to realise full benefits from their minerals,” he said. (more…)

Australian Greens and conservation groups condemn NSW decision to allow uranium exploration

February 26, 2012

O’Farrell’s 180 degrees on uranium a toxic turn,Senator Scott Ludlam,  February 14th, 2012. The New South Wales Government appears poised to commit a random act of colossal stupidity, following reports that the NSW Cabinet will move to overturn the state’s 26-year uranium ban. Greens spokesperson on nuclear affairs Senator Scott Ludlam said Premier Barry O’Farrell should stick to the position he held before being lobbied by the uranium industry and Federal ALP minister Martin Ferguson.

“In August 2011 it was revealed that resources minister and nuclear fanatic Martin Ferguson had urged Premier O’Farrell to lift the ban and the Australian Uranium Association had lobbied state resources and energy minister Chris Hartcher to do their dirty work. Asked in parliament if the government was considering lifting the ban, the Premier said no.”

“Uranium mining in the Northern Territory has a long and sorry history. More than forty years after Rum Jungle’s closure, the Federal Government recently committed eight million dollars over four years just for an attempt to figure out how to clean up the mess.

“Australian uranium was used in every reactor at Fukushima. Why would the O’Farrell Government want New South Wales to be complicit in the next disaster?”

Nuke South Wales? Uranium plan is unsafe and unwelcome, Dave Sweeney, AUSTRALIAN CONSERVATION FOUNDATION 15 February 2012  State government plans to open the door to the uranium mining in NSW are ill-considered and out of step with community opinion, the Australian Conservation Foundation said today.

“Premier Barry O’Farrell has not taken his uranium u-turn to the NSW community, because he knows it would be deeply unpopular,” said ACF nuclear free campaigner Dave Sweeney. “The uranium industry is unsafe, unclean and unwelcome in NSW. “For the NSW government to open the door to uranium mining now is like taking up smoking at thirty: it would bring high risk, little joy and it’s completely unnecessary.”

The last independent assessment of the Australian uranium industry – a 2003 Senate Inquiry – found the sector is characterised by underperformance and non-compliance, an absence of reliable data to measure the extent of contamination or its impact on the environment and an operational culture that gives greater weight to short term considerations than long term environmental protection.

The Senate report concluded that the uranium industry in Australia had to change to protect the environment and its inhabitants from ‘serious or irreversible damage’. “In the shadow of the first anniversary of the continuing Fukushima nuclear crisis – which was fuelled by Australian uranium – we need to move away from this controversial and contaminating industry, not open the door to more environmental and community threat,” Dave Sweeney said.  “The Premier lacks a mandate to mine.  This poorly considered policy reversal will be actively contested.”

NSW’s  peak environment group condemns Government green light for toxic impacts of uranium miningFebruary 15th 2012  The state’s peak environment group, the Nature Conservation Council of NSW, has strongly condemned Premier O’Farrell’s decision to overturn a 26‐year ban on uranium exploration in NSW.

“The O’Farrell government’s uranium exploration proposal leaves our local communities and our environment exposed to serious pollution risks and a persistent legacy of toxic waste,” Chief Executive Officer Pepe Clarke said today.

“Uranium mining consumes enormous volumes of water, contaminates groundwater and leaves behind a
legacy of radioactive mine waste, placing workers, local communities and the environment at risk.

“Less than one year after the tragic nuclear accident at Fukushima in Japan, it is incomprehensible that the O’Farrell government is planning to overturn a 26‐year ban on this dangerous, polluting industry…. http://www.nccnsw.org.au/media/nsw%E2%80%99s-peak-environment-group-condemns-government-green-light-toxic-impacts-uranium-industry

Opposition to uranium mining in New South Wales

February 26, 2012

Opposition lashes O’Farrell’s plan to overturn NSW ban on uranium exploration,  THE AUSTRALIAN, AAP, February 15, 2012   THE NSW opposition has criticised a plan to overturn the state’s decades-old ban on uranium exploration….. Opposition Leader John Robertson said voters don’t support the industry. ”The people of NSW didn’t vote for it and they don’t want it,” he said in a statement. ”Only months ago the Premier categorically ruled out uranium mining and exploration in NSW – now it is on for young and old.”

Greenpeace campaigner Julien Vincent called the expected announcement an “insult”….. ”Next month we are marking the first anniversary of nuclear disaster in Fukushima, which is one of the best reasons for not going nuclear,” he added.

Australian Greens nuclear affairs spokesperson Senator Scott Ludlam added: “Australian uranium was used in every reactor at Fukushima. ”Why would the O’Farrell government want New South Wales to be complicit in the next disaster?”

Uranium mining is banned in Queensland but allowed in Western Australia and South Australia.

… Just days before that vote Australian Workers’ Union secretary Paul Howes called on states that don’t allow uranium mining to overturn their bans. http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opposition-lashes-ofarrells-plan-to-overturn-nsw-ban-on-uranium-exploration/story-fn59niix-122

Malaysian politics – Lynas rare earths project is an election issue

February 26, 2012

Rare earth plant and general election  2012-02-03 , By LIM SUE GOAN Translated by SOONG PHUI JEE Sin Chew Daily, 6 Feb 2012, “……….Since the AELB has granted the Lynas a temporary operating licence (TOL), Lynas should have complied with the 11 recommendations made by the IAEA. The authority has also listed another five extra conditions under the TOL, including a detailed plan for a permanent disposal facility (PDF), to avoid repeating a similar waste disposal issue of the Bukit Merah rare earth plant.

However, why is Lynas given 10 months after the TOL’s issuance date to submit the plans and location of the PDF? In addition, the authority also has the right to appoint independent consultants to evaluate Lynas’ adherence to the set standards and regulations. Does it mean that the government may suspend the plant’s operation, if the conditions are found broken?

Also, Lynas must comply with the financial assurance condition by paying the government a US$50 million security bond in installments. However, it is not the main concern as the people’s health is priceless. With Lynas’ financial strength, US$50 million is nothing.

Would the anti-Lynas protest groups compromise after so much have been done by the government? Would the MCA and Chinese community groups change their stand? From the attitude of the Anti-Lynas groups and the public response, the Bukit Merah rare earth plant tragedy seems to be still clear in their minds. Under the international trend of concern over environmental issues, it is quite impossible to eliminate the opposition voices from the public.

The people resist even high-tension cables, telecommunication towers and garbage incinerator, how would they tolerate a rare earth plant that could bring radiation problems?

In addition, the authorities have left some doubts in dealing with the issue. For example, why the construction work of the plant was not suspended during the period when Lynas is required to fully comply with the 11 recommendations put forward by the IAEA? The progress of the construction work of the Mount Weld plant in Western Australia has even gone beyond expectation. Lynas had also constantly announced the date of operation, seemed like it was very sure of being granted an operation licence.

The uproar might be avoidable if the government has high credibility and supervision efficiency, which are also the key of the issue. http://www.mysinchew.com/node/69705

Although the Lynas rare earth plant is the world’s largest rare earth plant with the capacity to meet a fifth of the world’s demand, the people’s health is still the most important issue. The rare earth plant issue will be a thorny issue for the election.

Lynas rare earths plant – nice for the politicians, not for the people

February 26, 2012

Lynas plant a done deal from the start , malaysiakini,  Feb 7, 2012 “……Manjit Bhatia: These protests against Lynas are very worthwhile. The Lynas project should never have been given the green light in the first place, let alone a temporary licence by the Umno-BN regime.

What’s really galling is that the regime went ahead with the latter despite Lynas failing to provide all of the mandatory guarantees needed. Worse, though: were there any public consultations about the project to start with? I feel the protests at Lynas aren’t big enough to put sufficient political pressure on the company to reconsider its operations…..

If it’s not good enough for Australia, it shouldn’t be good enough for any other place on earth. 

If the bulk of Malaysians do not join their Lynas protestors and stop the project dead in its tracks and soon, then you’ve lost the chance forever – unless Pakatan Rakyat wins government and scuttles the project entirely.

Although Malaysians have to cop a huge compensation bill to Lynas, it’ll be worth it. Just wear the fiscal pain for a decade.

Pemerhati: This is the price Malaysians pay for electing corrupt and greedy Umno thieves as their leaders……

 if waste disposal is so safe and environmentally friendly, why don’t Lynas do it in Australia? Why shift all the way here?….

CiViC: The concern now is exposing our people, our land to radioactive waste, radiation and pollution. This is not the people’s needs.

Thousands of people have protested, and still the dirty corrupt BN government pushes it through. And please don’t start with economic gains and such bull, there are no gains here since Lynas needs not pay tax, and the guarantee they have posted is not even enough to clean the plant itself, what more pollution beyond that…. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/188438

Strong opposition to Lynas’ rare earths plant in Malaysia

February 26, 2012

We are disappointed but not surprised by the very weak application presented by Lynas. Most worrying of all is that Lynas’ proposed waste management plan is full of holes and is totally unsafe. “

Raw Earth Miners and Processors, Bad Developers, 2 Feb 12 Today marked the final day for public comments on Lynas’ application for the pre-operational licence for its Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in Gebeng.
Together with concerned citizens including representatives from the Pahang Bar Council and the Malaysian Medical Association who converged at the Pahang Secretariat Office, SMSL and SLC delivered a joint
submission to MOSTI and the AELB urging the two authorities to reject Lynas’ application until a safer plan is produced.

Mr Tan Bun Teet, the Chairperson of SMSL lamented, “We are disappointed but not surprised by the very weak application presented by Lynas. Most worrying of all is that Lynas’ proposed waste management plan is full of holes and is totally unsafe. Under no circumstance should the Malaysian Government issues the licence.” (more…)

Lynas gets temporary license, but still has no radioactive waste disposal plan

February 26, 2012

Lynas’s plant is near Kuantan, the capital city of the central Pahang state. Protests by residents and non-governmental organizations over the past 10 months included a march on Malaysia’s parliament and the Australian High Commission in Kuala Lumpur….

China has been limiting rare-earth output and exports since 2009 on concerns mining activities caused pollution

Lynas Granted Temporary Rare-Earth Refining License From Malaysian Board, Bloomberg, By Manirajan Ramasamy – Feb 1, 2012 Malaysia’s Atomic Energy Licensing Board granted Lynas Corp. (LYC) a temporary operating license to begin refining rare earths under certain conditions following public protests.

The Sydney-based miner will be able to start refining under conditions that include a plan for a permanent disposal facility and paying the government a $50 million security bond in installments, the board said in an e-mailed statement yesterday.
Lynas’s plant would be the world’s largest refinery of the minerals with total capacity of 22,000 tons per year should a second phase be approved and completed, the company said on Nov. 16.

Its plan to start production in September was delayed after the government imposed extra safety standards recommended by an international review panel after residents expressed fears over possible radiation and contamination.
The Australian company, which has rejected the health concerns, has been unable to start exporting ore to Malaysia for refining after opening its A$100 million ($107 million) Mount Weld mine in Western Australia in August. (more…)


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.