Archive for the ‘uranium enrichment’ Category

South Korea wants to enrich uranium – setback to making a nuclear deal with USA

April 28, 2013

South Korea and U.S. Fail to Reach Deal on Nuclear Energy, NYT, By CHOE SANG-HUN, April 24, 2013 SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the Obama administration delayed the deadline for a deal that Seoul had hoped would allow it to begin making its own fuel for its civil nuclear energy program, but that the United States feared would undermine its attempts to curb nuclear proliferation. It had appeared that a deal might be reached this year, but officials in both countries said the deadline would slip until 2016.

The government of President Park Geun-hye has been pushing hard for the United States to lift a ban, part of a treaty signed in 1972, that prevents South Korea from enriching uranium and reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.

But the same technologies are also used to make material for nuclear weapons. American officials have said that lifting the ban would have complicated diplomatic efforts to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear programs and to stop any attempt by Iran to develop atomic weapons….. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/25/world/asia/south-korea-and-us-fail-to-reach-nuclear-energy-deal.html

Nevada getting shipments of radioactive waste weapons fuel

February 10, 2013

DOE: Uranium shipments to Nevada could start soon, knoxnews.com,  Associated Press  December 31, 2012 OAK RIDGE, Tenn. (AP) — A U.S. Department of Energy official says stocks of radioactive uranium could start shipping from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to Nevada in 2013.

However, The Knoxville News Sentinel reports (http://bit.ly/WVktTK ) that agency officials will not discuss exact dates of the shipments because of safety and security reasons because of the fissionable material’s potential use in nuclear weapons. DOE’s Environmental Manager Mark Whitney said in an interview with the newspaper this fall that the DOE wanted to start the shipments to the Nevada National Security site in early 2013 pending approvals to ship.

The agency released another statement saying that all approvals for shipment were not yet in place, but they expected approval soon.

The shipments are part of a program to dispose of a stockpile of old reactor fuel called the Consolidated Edison Uranium Solidification Project that has been housed at Oak Ridge for decades.

The 1980s project processed the radioactive materials for storage and there are 403 canisters contained about 2.6 kilograms of uranium in each. The radiation at the exterior of the canisters is about 300 rads per hour, which categorizes it as a high-hazard level.

The energy department said a container sleeve acts as a shield and has reduced the radiation field by about half.

Whitney did not agree with an analysis by the Institute for Policy Studies released earlier this year criticizing the plans to disposal of the materials, which suggested the agency would have to waive its own rules in order to bury the materials in the Nevada desert landfill….. http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/dec/31/doe-uranium-shipments-to-nevada-could-start-soon/

Shut down Lansdowne uranium processing plant- call from City Councillor

December 28, 2012

Councillor asks uranium plant to shut down Facility on Lansdowne has been quietly processing nuclear fuel for decades Toronto NOW, 23 Nov 12 By BEN SPURR Amid mounting concerns from his west downtown community, a city councillor is asking controversial uranium plant on Lansdowne Ave. to pack up and move out of his ward.

 In a motion that will go before council next week, Councillor Cesar Palacio is requesting that the city work with General Electric-Hitachi on a five-year plan to phase out the production of nuclear fuel pellets at the company’s Davenport Village facility.
“The question is, is this the right kind of operation that should be in the middle of people’s backyards?” Palacio says. “This use is not compatible with the rest of the community.”…
At recent community meetings, residents have vented their anger at GE-Hitachi officials, as well as Palacio himself, for not alerting them to the operation. NOW first published a story on the plant in October, but before it received media coverage few residents knew that nuclear fuel was being produced in their midst. Palacio says he didn’t know about it until he read the media reports, and accuses the company of keeping him out of the loop.
Zach Ruiter, an anti-nuclear activist, went door to door in the neighbourhood last month warning people about the plant, which has been converting uranium powder into nuclear reactor fuel pellets for fifty years. He says that Palacio’s five-year phase-out proposal doesn’t move nearly fast enough. …. http://www.nowtoronto.com/news/story.cfm?content=189925

Laser uranium enrichment technology could be a boon for nuclear weapons proliferation

December 28, 2012

U.S. approval for laser enrichment - could spur new clandestine research and construction in other nations that might make bomb-building efforts by nuclear-arms aspirants easier to conceal. 

Decision on Proliferation Assessments Pending at Nuclear Agency, Nov. 20, 2012 By Elaine M. Grossman Global Security Newswire 
A roadway marker points to nuclear fuel operations at a GE-Hitachi campus in North Carolina. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission might soon decide whether to demand proliferation threat assessments from firms seeking licenses for new fuel-making activities, such as a commercial laser uranium-enrichment approach proposed by the energy conglomerate
(Tom Clements/Alliance for Nuclear Accountability). (more…)

South Korea wants to enrich uranium

November 4, 2012

S. Korea urges U.S. to allow ‘peaceful’ nuclear enrichment SEOUL, Sept. 17 (Yonhap) -- South Korea called for the United States to approve it undertaking “peaceful” enrichment of uranium and reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel, a government think tank said Monday, as little progress has been made in bilateral negotiations to revise the countries’ nuclear accord.

Under a 1974 accord with the U.S., South Korea is banned from enriching uranium or reprocessing spent nuclear fuel. The allies have held five rounds of formal negotiations since 2010 to rewrite the bilateral nuclear cooperation treaty, which expires in 2014…..
Some nonproliferation experts say pyroprocessing is not significantly different from reprocessing, and pyroprocessed plutonium could be quickly turned into weapons-grade material….. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2012/09/17/38/0301000000AEN20120917002600315F.HTML

Kazakhstan’s enriched uranium graveyard?

November 4, 2012

Nuclear fuel bank or nuclear graveyard? Asia Times, 5 Sept 12, By Zhulduz Baizakova  Kazakhstan plans to build an international nuclear fuel bank in Ust-Kamenogorsk (Oskemen), in the country’s east, at the site of Ulba Metallurgic Plant, part of the giant national company Kazatomprom, which produces fuel tablets for nuclear power plants.

While the authorities are keen on the plan, some citizens are seriously questioning it – questions that are likely to remain largely unanswered.

The nuclear fuel bank will store low-enriched uranium for the fuel assemblies of nuclear power plants under the auspices of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). LEU is a special fissionable material containing a concentration of uranium-235 of less than 20%.

In March 2010, Russia introduced the first LEU reserve (to store  120 tonnes) for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) at the International Uranium Enrichment Center in Angarsk, southeastern Siberia. The terms and conditions were the same as being currently negotiated with Kazakhstan: The host country provides the storage facility and funds the maintenance, physical security and safeguards.

Kazakhstan offered to store LEU in 2009-2010 and met the three main criteria: The country is politically neutral; it abides by the nuclear non-proliferation regime; and it is able to supply LEU to any country that meets the non-proliferation requirements. The LEU would remain legally under the control of the IAEA and be supplied at free-market prices. ……

this was a political project for Kazakhstan aimed at strengthening the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and that the fuel would be officially kept under IAEA control. ….
 

…..
 the general population remains confused as to what purpose the fuel bank might serve in Kazakhstan, as many understand that there is little if any economic benefit to be gained.
Some locals demand that before making the crucial decision on physically building the facilities for the bank, the population should be consulted and everything explained. Some are worried that there is very little economic benefit to be realized from hosting the bank. Others cannot help suspecting that under the guise of low-enriched uranium, the plant will host real nuclear waste and damage the fragile environment of East Kazakhstan province even further. …
Mielz Eleusizov, leader of the Tabigat Ecological Union, suspects that it will turn out to be a disguised storage facility for spent nuclear fuel. ….
 the major obstacle is constant reference to the tragic past of the former Soviet republic being used as a nuclear test site and the environmental and health implications that entailed….. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/NI07Ag01.html

USA opposes South Korea’s wish for uranium enrichment

August 12, 2012

Samore says no need for S. Korea to enrich uranium By Lee Chi-dong WASHINGTON, July 23 (Yonhap) — Gary Samore, President Barack Obama’s top aide for nonproliferation, said Monday that the U.S. sees no need for South Korea to enrich uranium, a stance against Seoul’s goals. (more…)

Nuclear weapons spread made easier by Silex laser uranium enrichment

August 12, 2012

a SILEX facility could make it much easier for a rogue state to clandestinely enrich weapons grade uranium to create nuclear bombs

SILEX could become America’s proliferation Fukushima,

Controversial nuclear technology alarms watchdogs  http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/intelligent-energy/controversial-nuclear-technology-alarms-watchdogs/18138  By David Worthington | July 30, 2012 A controversial nuclear technology is raising alarms bells among critics who claim it may be better suited for making nuclear weapons than lowering the cost of nuclear power and could lead to a nonproliferation “Fukushima” for the United States.

SILEX (separation of isotopes by laser excitation) is a method for enriching uranium with lasers. It was developed by Australian scientists during the mid 1990’s as a way to reduce the cost of nuclear fuel, because uranium must be processed before it can be used to generate power.

The scientists formed Silex Systems to license the technology for commercialization, and that process is still ongoing. In 2000, the governments of Australia and the United States signed a treaty, giving the U.S. authority to review whether SILEX should be deployed. That’s because there could be a major proliferation problem. SILEX reduces the steps necessary to transform fuel grade uranium into to weapons-grade uranium, and the process doesn’t create telltale chemical or thermal emissions, according to an article published by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. R. Scott Kemp, an assistant professor of nuclear science and engineering at MIT, has the byline.

Its commercial appeal is that uranium enrichment in traditional gas centrifuges is expensive, and carries a high facilities cost. A SILEX facility can be up to 75 percent smaller and uses less energy, according to a SILEX licensee GE subsidiary Global Laser Enrichment.

Despite this perceived benefit, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists argues that the technology could make “Iran style proliferation easier,” and it is not alone in its view. Kemp corralled together a host of supportive opinions including the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences, American Physical SocietyFederation of American Scientists, a former US nuclear-weapons lab director, and several members of Congress are calling on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to review SILEX.

“The NRC is in the final stages of reviewing a license application from GE-Hitachi/Global Laser Enrichment (filed in July 2007) to construct and operate a laser enrichment facility near Wilmington, N.C. Information on this application and the NRC’s review is available online,” said NRC public affairs officer David McIntyre. The 2000 agreement gives Silex Systems access to U.S. investors.

McIntyre cited a 1999 U.S. Department of State assessment of SILEX when questioned about proliferation concerns. “This review concluded that it was in the US national interest to bring the technology here and maintain control of it,” he said. “The NRC’s requirements for the control and protection of classified information and security of nuclear material address nonproliferation concerns.”

The same report suggested that a SILEX facility could make it much easier for a rogue state to clandestinely enrich weapons grade uranium to create nuclear bombs, the Bulletin reports (more…)

Negotiations may lead to halt in Iran’s uranium enrichment

July 13, 2012

Iran May Consider Halt To 20% Uranium Enrichment, Press TV Says By Ladane Nasseri - Jul 7, 2012 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-08/iran-may-consider-halt-to-20-uranium-enrichment-press-tv-says.html An Iranian parliament lawmaker said his country is willing to consider the temporary suspension of 20-percent uranium enrichment as part of a negotiated accord, state-run Press TV news channel reported.

In return the so-called P5+1 — U.S., U.K., France, China, Russia and Germany — must agree to meet the country’s needs for 20-percent enriched uranium, said Mohammad-Hassan Asferi, a member of the Parliament’s national security and foreign policy committee, according to Press TV.

Iran would be willing to suspend its 20-percent enrichment activity for a specific period if western powers meet its enrichment needs during this time, Asferi said, adding that permanent suspension is “by no means acceptable.”

Iran would also expect sanctions to be lifted and the nuclear dossier to be pulled out of the UN Security Council and referred back to the International Atomic Energy Agency, he said, according to Press TV.

AREVA’s troubles getting funding for uranium enrichment plant

July 13, 2012

Uranium enrichment plant near Idaho Falls could be delayed KTVB.com.. July 7, 2012 BOISE, Idaho — Areva still hasn’t announced a partner to help build its proposed gas centrifuge uranium enrichment plant near Idaho Falls.

If it can’t find an investor, construction on the $3 billion project will likely be delayed until 2014…. Spokesman Mike French said Areva is still seeking assistance. If no suitable investor is found or steps forward, he says it could push construction back until early 2014.
http://www.ktvb.com/news/Idaho-uranium-enrichment-project-could-be-delayed-161675625.html


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.