Unpopularity of Western uranium mining companies in Malawi

April 28, 2013

Paladin has MK3.9bn environmental bond for Malawi uranium mine -Walker Nyasa Times 
April 3, 2013 “…..Nach Sale Says:  Ngoma, you cannot take away the fact that western investors are highly exploitative and their governments hypocritical. They talk about the the mathematics and accounts of investment but at the end of the day they benefit more and their governments take that same money and give us as aid.

Paladin deal shoud be renegotiated – simple and straight forward.
fker Says: stupid Bingu was the one who put Paladin in do you really believe everything was done correct . Everything the old man did required a payoff or backhand. There is no doubt that Paladin had to bribe to get the license . there is no doubt Malawi is getting a raw deal .

Nach Sale Says :P aladin is ripping us off all because our politicians are greedy and ignorant on how to sign deals.Paladin palm oiled government and that is why both DPP and PP have never wanted to be transparent about the deal. The west of course has been quiet because the money Paladin is ‘stealing’ from Malawi is enriching the west. Then they give back our money as ‘aid’. If Banda was to demand that the deal is renegotiated you will see the west ganging up against Malawi. That is how bad the west is exploiting poor countries but pretending that they are democratic and transparent. http://www.nyasatimes.com/2013/04/03/paladin-has-mk3-9bn-environmental-bond-for-malawi-uranium-mine-walker/

Two women given charge of Wiluna uranium project – the poisoned chalice?

April 28, 2013

Women call shots at U-miner Nick Butterly Canberra, The West Australian April 3, 2013, 

WA’s first uranium miner will be headed by two women.The company Toro Energy is led by Dr Vanessa Guthrie and Dr Erica Smyth, both boasting a long list of achievements in the State’s male-dominated resources sector.

Dr Guthrie is managing director of Toro and Dr Smyth is its non-executive chairman.

Dr Guthrie acknowledged it was unusual for a miner to have both a female chief executive and a chairman…..

Dr Smyth  said the fact a mining company headed by two women was succeeding showed how the resources industry was changing and stereotypes were being broken down. http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/wa/16515070/women-call-shots-at-u-miner/

Christina’s comment – “Oh yeah!  - more like the stereotype of giving the impossible jobs to women!”

Western Australia’s economic and environmental risk in Wiluna uranium scheme

April 28, 2013

Burke’s blunder on Wiluna uranium scheme 2 April 2013. The Australian Greens strongly condemned today’s decision of Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke to allow the mining of uranium in Wiluna, Western Australia.

The Greens nuclear policy spokesperson, Senator for Western Australia Scott Ludlam, (left) said the approval showed Labor could not be trusted to protect the environment or public health.

“Today marks the beginning of the campaign to stop Toro, and the Greens will remain a strong voice to prevent the expansion of uranium mining around Australia.  With the government’s abandonment of environmental protection, the Greens will target the investment community to ensure that investors continue to shun this unwanted industry.

“While the Minister has placed 36 conditions on the approval, there is simply no safe way to mine uranium on a lake bed that floods.  This is a rookie company with no operating mines. The WA Government got it badly wrong and the Federal Government just blew its chance to fix this mess.

“Under new mine closure guidelines, Toro has to find 100% of the mine closure cost, around $150 million, before it has raised the $300 million to open it.  With uranium prices plummeting by more than two thirds since its peak in 2007, it is highly unlikely that Toro can open, maintain and close a mine abiding by the necessary conditions and environmental standards.

“150 nuclear power plants are scheduled for closure without replacement in Europe alone.  Toro’s business case is based on wildly unrealistic assumptions, including the projection that the US dollar will suddenly strengthen against the Australian dollar.  Tony Burke is placing our environment and public health at huge risk for precious little prospective reward.

“Australian uranium was in the four reactors of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan.  After more than two years, large areas of Japan are toxic and 160,000 people remain evacuated from their homes.  It is time Australians got out of this industry.”

Uranium mining not much value for Queensland

April 28, 2013

NGOs release alternative report to Uranium Implementation Committee
Queensland Nuclear Free Alliance  March 18, 2013 
High Risk – Low Returns: the case against uranium mining in Queensland is the NGO and civil society response to the LNPs undemocratic decision to go ahead with uranium mining in our state.
Read the report http://qnfa.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/180313highcost-lowreturn-uinqld.pdf

In October 2012 the LNP government broke its clear commitment not to allow uranium mining in Queensland. This commitment was the position of the LNP at the March 2012 state election and was reaffirmed after they took office. In the absence of open, inclusive and evidence based policy making the Newman LNP government has set up the Uranium Implementation Committee. The Committee has not sought broad community input and has not been asked to assess the arguments for and against uranium mining in Queensland. The Committee’s mandate is the far  narrower task of recommending how uranium mining should be managed, not whether it should occur.

Why should Queensland forego the economic benefits of uranium mining when some other states permit uranium mines? In a nutshell, it is because the economic benefits are grossly overstated and are outweighed by the wide-ranging environmental, public health and weapons proliferation problems and risks.

Uranium accounted for 0.19 per cent of Australia’s export revenue in 2011/12 (the last available figures). By the most generous estimate, uranium accounts for 0.015% of all jobs in Australia. For Queensland, there is the additional limitation that the state has around just 2% of Australia’s uranium resources. Clearly, the industry has no capacity to deliver significant economic or employment benefits.

Instead of acknowledging the extremely limited economic potential of uranium mining in Queensland the LNP state government, the Australian Uranium Association and the Queensland Resources Council have continued a pattern of extravagant and unsubstantiated claims regarding jobs, revenue and royalties. Enthusiasm is no substitute for evidence and limited sectoral self-interest is not the same as the public interest.The assumptions and analysis of those promoting the uranium sector in Queensland needs to be challenged and reviewed.– Most companies interested in uranium in Queensland are foreign companies, any profits of which would not remain in Queensland. The mining industry has a history of fly-in fly-out contract employment, which does not necessarily bring many or lasting jobs or significant prosperity to local economies. And once the ore is extracted, the company will leave the community to manage the radioactive tailings, effectively forever. Private profit would leave the region while increased public risk and legacy would remain.

Uranium mining poses a significant threat to Queensland’s unique environment and way of life. It is implausible that the limited economic benefits associated with any future uranium operations in Queensland could outweigh the diverse problems and risks associated with uranium mining detailed in this paper.

The specific radioactive and fissionable characteristics of uranium make uranium mining fundamentally different from other types of mining. Uranium mining is associated with:

radiological risks to workers and the public;
direct and continuing contamination threats to ground and surface waters and the environment surrounding and downstream and downwind from mine sites
risks to other industries such as agriculture and tourism due to environmental damage and contamination from tailings and mine wastes,
the flow-on risks of the nuclear fuel chain and the risks inherent in nuclear power, including the fact that Australian uranium directly fuelled the continuing Fukushima nuclear crisis.
the generation – at all stages of the industrial process – of large volumes of long-lived radioactive wastes, including intractable high-level nuclear waste created in nuclear reactors.
the spread and legitimization of weapons of mass destruction (WMD).

It is our considered view that the uranium mining sector fails key sustainability, safety and social benefit tests and should not be permitted or advanced.

This week a joint effort by Unions and NGOs will release an alternative to the QLD government’s Uranium Implementation Report: “High Risk – Low Return: the case against uranium mining in Queensland”.

Read the report http://qnfa.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/180313highcost-lowreturn-uinqld.pdf

Radioactive water still leaking from Mary Kathleen uranium mine – 30 years after closure

April 28, 2013

Queensland’s last uranium mine still leaking radioactive water 30 years after production stopped   John McCarthy  The Courier-Mail  March 21, 2013  THE state’s last uranium mine at Mary Kathleen – in the Selwyn Range between Mount Isa and Cloncurry – is still leaking radioactive water from the site 30 years after production stopped. But, according to a committee report handed to the State Government this week, the return of uranium mining to Queensland is “risky but manageable”.

“The uranium mining industry has a number of inherent environmental risks,” the report said….. The report says the Mary Kathleen mine’s pit is still full of highly contaminated water to a depth of about 50m, and since the mine closed in 1982, several other studies have found “ongoing environmental legacy issues”.

Those include the seepage of acidic, metal-rich, radioactive waters from the base of the tailings dam into the former evaporation ponds and local drainage system.

 Surface waters downstream of the mine’s tailings dam have concentrations of contaminants that exceed the Australian water quality guideline values for livestock drinking water.

Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Dave Sweeney said there was no evidence that uranium mining was safe because not one former mine had been rehabilitated properly.

“In the Northern Territory there is a range of old mines, maybe a dozen or more, that are still being cleaned up 50 years after the event,” Mr Sweeney said…… http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/queenslands-last-uranium-mine-still-leaking-radioactive-water-30-years-after-production-stopped/story-e6freoof-1226601866129

Uranium transport through Barrier Reef? Queensland government appears willing

April 28, 2013

Uranium export through Reef not ruled out 9 News, March 18, 2013 The Queensland government won’t rule out exporting uranium through the Great Barrier Reef, after receiving a report advocating a return to mining the radioactive material.Natural Resources and Mines Minister Andrew Cripps made the concession on Monday after receiving 40 recommendations from a committee tasked with examining the resurrection of the uranium mining industry.

Uranium mining was banned in Queensland in 1989 and the material hasn’t actually been mined since 1982. The Uranium Mining Implementation Committee’s report has recommended uranium be exported from ports in Adelaide and Darwin, given they already have the appropriate environmental licences.

However, committee chairman Paul Bell says the option is open for a port to be opened up in Queensland if demand warrants it. Talks have already been held with the Port of Townsville, he says.

Mr Cripps has not ruled out shipping uranium through the reef…. green groups remain unimpressed and have hit out at the government for lifting the ban despite saying before the election that it had no plans to do so.

An anti-uranium mining alliance of key environmental groups produced its own report on Monday, labelling the industry “high risk, low return”. ”Premier (Campbell) Newman was elected with a no-mines position and then broke this commitment without evidence, independent assessment or consultation,” alliance spokeswoman Robin Taubenfield said in a statement.

Mining industries slump in Australia’s Northern Territory

April 28, 2013

Time the NT got resourceful, ABC Rural By Caddie Brain , 19 March  2013 ”……..Uranium exploration projects seem to be struggling to raise capital more than any other resource, with investment down by 70 per cent.Oil, gas and petroleum on the other hand is booming, with an unprecedented 9 per cent of the Territory now subject to petroleum licences or licence applications…..

the Northern Territory Government says it’s concerned that so few projects have made the transition from exploration to mining over the past decade. The last mine was opened in 2006, and there’s been no major greenfield sites developed in the last 20 years.

In his opening remarks, Mines and Energy Minister Willem Westra Van Holthe said while it will support further minerals and petroleum exploration, it’s likely that major projects will rely on foreign investment to get off the ground….. http://www.abc.net.au/rural/content/2013/s3719273.htm

At last – protection from uranium mining for beautiful Koongarra

April 28, 2013

Australia: Koongarra is now permanently protected from uranium companies INTERCONTINENTAL CRY, BY JOHN AHNI SCHERTOW • MAR 18, 2013 “……..Koongarra wasn’t the only area that was excluded from the National Park. The government also left out the “Ranger” and “Jabiluka” sites, both of which are owned by another mining giant, Rio Tinto. Currently, only the Ranger site is being actively exploited.

The Ranger mine is a massive controversy onto itself. Ever since the mining operation began, there have been more than 100 environmental errors and breaches leading to the unintentional release of approximately 12 million liters of contaminated water, as Mirarr Elder Yvonne Margarula explained in a 2011 letter to UN Secretary-General Ban ki-Moon. Despite the concerns, Rio Tinto–through its subsidiary, Energy Resources of Australia (ERA)–wants to expand the Ranger mine.

The Jabiluka site is a very different story. Exploitation of this deposit was halted in 1998, following an eight-month blockade that involved thousands of indigenous and non-indigenous protesters. As a result of that effort, Rio Tinto eventually came to sign the “Jabiluka Long-Term Care and Maintenance Agreement” which guaranteed that the Mirarr would have veto rights over any future ‘development’ at Jabiluka.

However, that’s just not good enough for the Mirarr. Like with the Koongarra site, they want to bring Jabiluka and Ranger into the National Park.

Yvonne Margarula recently stated, “Traditional Owners must be allowed to make their own decisions about development on their country. Jeffrey has been speaking out to protect his country and we support him. He has always said no to mining at Koongarra and we support him when he says he wants to see that country put into the National Park. We want to see the same protection for Mirarr country.”

Around the same time that Environment Minister Tony Burke introduced the “Completion of Kakadu National Park Bill” the Mirrar Peoples announced that they had initiated “a renegotiated agreement for the existing Ranger mine, which was imposed on them in 1978. This agreement, along with provisions of the federal Atomic Energy Act, provides for the Ranger area to also be included into Kakadu National Park as the mine is rehabilitated.”

Justin O’Brien, The executive officer of Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation, which represents the Mirarr Traditional Owners, commented, “This action by the government is to be applauded, although the name of the bill incorrectly implies that this completes the national park. There is further work to be done and we still look forward to the day when all of Kakadu is included in the National Park and adequately protected from unwanted industrial development.”

For further information and interviews with Mr Lee and Mr O’Brien: 08 8979 2200 or 0427 008 765 http://intercontinentalcry.org/australia-koongarra-is-now-permanently-protected-from-uranium-companies/

A uranium free Kakadu – a goal, as Koongarra is incorporated into the national park

April 28, 2013

Koongarra’s inclusion welcome, but Kakadu remains incomplete. 14 March, 2013. The Greens today welcomed the inclusion of the Koongarra mineral lease in Kakadu National Park, but said Kakadu would remain incomplete until the Jabiluka and Ranger mineral leases are returned.

Greens Senator Scott Ludlam praised the efforts of Traditional Owner Jeffrey Lee, who had been in the public gallery when the Bill was introduced in early February.

“When Mr Lee came to Canberra a few weeks ago to witness this Bill being introduced, he said ‘Money comes and goes but the land is always here… If we look after it, it will look after us.’ …It’s difficult to comprehend the pressure Mr Lee withstood so we could get to this point, but I want to pay tribute to this fine and courageous man, a softly spoken and gentle man, who stood up to some of the most powerful interests on earth, and won,” Senator Ludlam told the Senate.

Koongarra was finally recognised in June 2011 by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee for having both cultural and environmental significance.  Mr Lee has acknowledged the support from the Mirarr people; especially their senior Traditional Owner, Ms Yvonne Margarula.

“The 1,228 hectare area of Koongarra should have been in Kakadu long ago, but will finally have the protection it deserves upon passage of this Bill.  This is a step forward for the integrity of the Kakadu World Heritage area, but Kakadu will not be ‘complete’ until the Ranger and Jabiluka mineral leases have been reincorporated into the Park and custodianship restored to the Traditional Owners of the area.”

“Ranger uranium mine is a toxic blot on the landscape that leaks up to 100,000 litres of radioactive water into the park every day.  There have been over 150 leaks, spills and licence breaches since the mine opened.  Despite ongoing problems and aging infrastructure, ERA is considering expansion at Ranger.  I call on the Environment Minister to protect Kakadu from the ongoing threat of Ranger,” Senator Ludlam told the Senate.

“Rehabilitating the mess at Ranger will be a long and difficult task, and one that won’t begin until the Government gets it right and returns it to the Park.  For today though, we can all celebrate this outcome.”

Closer scrutiny for Kakadu uranium mine welcomed by Aboriginal landowners

April 28, 2013

Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation (GAC) has today welcomed Environment Minister Tony Burke’s announcement that Energy Resources of Australia’s proposal to build an underground uranium mine, the so-called Ranger 3 Deeps, will be subject to a full Federal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

GAC – the organisation established and run by the Mirarr Traditional Owners of the Ranger uranium mine site, where the underground operations are planned, as well as much of Kakadu National Park – called for this level of assessment. The proposal affects a number of Matters of National Environmental Significance as it is a Nuclear Action occurring within a World Heritage listed Wetland of National Significance.

Kakadu experiences high rainfall and insufficient research has been done to be to predict the effect that underground operations will have on the surrounding wetlands.

“The Mirarr welcome the Minister’s decision. The Ranger 3 Deeps proposal is an entirely new method of mining within the bounds of Kakadu National Park and must therefore be subject to a high level of scrutiny. Energy Resources of Australia (ERA) has no experience with underground mining and the potential for water management or other environmental issues within the World Heritage area demand close examination,” said Justin O’Brien, Executive Officer of Gundjeihmi Aboriginal Corporation.

ERA currently has approval to mine on the Ranger Project Area until 2021 and has not publicly confirmed if it intends to seek a new mining approval beyond that date.

 For further information or comment contact Justin O’Brien: 0427 008 765


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.